Board Self Discipline

Only the board itself has the authority and the responsibility to set rules for its own operation. Formulating these self-expectations should be a matter of considerable board discussion with careful consideration for the implications of differing options. Once agreed to, board education must be put in place to provide the required skills. Performance against these expectations has to be regularly assessed. The expectations and lots of case examples must also form the basis of new board member orientations. Board self-assessment, continuing board education and skills training should be built into every board meeting with intensive work once a year at a multi-day board retreat. Get some professional help. None of this is easy.


Some basic considerations:
1. The board must speak with one voice. Until the board decides on a policy there should be no speculation, announcement, information leaking, chat or complaining. Once there is a policy, all board members must support the policy regardless of their private position on the issue, or resign from the board.
2. The board should function as a whole body. Do not delegate central board functions to individuals or board committees. There are no bystanders on the board; there should be no second-class board members less ‘in the know' than others.
3. Avoid standing committees. They fragment the board work and let some board members ‘off the hook'.
     a. No finance committee: if you have one, no one else on the board really expects to thoroughly understand and be responsible for the financial statements and related board work.
     b. No Executive Committee: these members always have more information earlier than other board members which gives them a higher status on the board. That produces a "in-group' and the rest. How long will the rest remain supportive, particularly if there is difficult work to be done?
4. Avoid designating board members to oversee operational functions. This occurs, for example, when there is a Treasurer. Treasurers and finance committees interfere with and deflect operational responsibilities from senior staff.
5. If a board committee is required to prepare proposals for board action, for example, to reconsider the organizations' purpose or to prepare a strategic plan to more efficiently achieve that purpose, then the board must write a specific commission for that board committee. The commission must specify the goals, the output requirements, timeline, resources available, supervision schedule and a sunset date. The board as a whole then must monitor committee performance against the commission and take corrective action as required.

Post a comment.
(Not registered? Register now.)
Your Email *
Your Password *
Your Name *
Choose a Password *
Enter it Again *
Comments *
  * indicates a required field

Comments

No comments found.

Recent Posts

Specificity Click-bait
June 15, 2017

    3 Things Great Leaders Never Do. 5 Keys to Organizational Change. 7 Days to C-Suite Nirvana. Does anyone really believe this clickbait? This meme of false s...

FITBIT Your Strategy
June 8, 2017

We are going to assume that you do HAVE a strategy that is guiding decisions towards some well-defined goals. You aren't just reacting from one crisis to the next, right? OK then,...

Get the Little Things Right
April 19, 2017

You must be good at the little things to be an effective consultant or change agent. Any good cook knows that. And you have to take the time. Scratch made puff pastry is a wondrous thing, not a...

Align Behavior with Goals
April 4, 2017

The last two posts took up the problems of getting all organizational work aligned to real goals for that organization.  The point of this effort, and it does take focused effort, is ...

Subscribe   RSS

Follow Us
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Share

Search Blogs