- Lynn Curry
- Situational Analysis
- Change Management
- Program Design
What would happen if we reduced the stakes in testing?
We certainly have the technology and the knowledge to make all testing formative with the explicit objective of identifying additional KSAs needed to do well (enough) in target contexts. Focus could then shift from the infrequent high stakes, winner/ loser decision making into an array of issues that we are not attending to well enough at present. Things like the full range of KSAs needed in target contexts, not just the easy to measure cognitive command of written materials. Changing the focus and reducing the emotional pressure will also reduce gaming and cheating on high stakes testing. Being clear about KSAs needed in target contexts will improve the relevancy of the testing and make test-takers' motivation congruent with doing well in their target next steps. They need no longer spotlight just passing tests or checking off competencies.
Focus on a good fit into the target context will also force test developers and educators to pay attention to the details of those target contexts. There are nuanced differences related to culture, language, justice and heritage inherent in the target situations: the people (e.g. the patients, parents, students, and colleagues), the physical settings (e.g. the type, amount of relevant support material; quality, convenience and suitability of infrastructure) and the social setting (e.g. safety, displacement, famine, dependence).
All these features (and more) affect the KSAs required for competent performance in specific contexts. Right now these are mostly ignored in favor of a "baseline" concept of minimally acceptable competencies. Kind of like a least common denominator definition of competence. People pass those minimal competencies as measured in the high-stakes testing situations and are then are expected to learn everything else relevant to their target context on the job. At best that is inefficient. It can also be dangerous while the newbie inevitably makes errors trying to figure out what to do in the new context. Some never do figure it out before their frustrations push them out. These are resources lost to the context for lack of fitting preparation. We can do better.
No comments found.
June 15, 2017
3 Things Great Leaders Never Do. 5 Keys to Organizational Change. 7 Days to C-Suite Nirvana. Does anyone really believe this clickbait? This meme of false s...
FITBIT Your Strategy
June 8, 2017
We are going to assume that you do HAVE a strategy that is guiding decisions towards some well-defined goals. You aren't just reacting from one crisis to the next, right? OK then,...
Get the Little Things Right
April 19, 2017
You must be good at the little things to be an effective consultant or change agent. Any good cook knows that. And you have to take the time. Scratch made puff pastry is a wondrous thing, not a...
Align Behavior with Goals
April 4, 2017
The last two posts took up the problems of getting all organizational work aligned to real goals for that organization. The point of this effort, and it does take focused effort, is ...